I've been continuing an email discussion with several readers about this business of "book-bridging" plot lines: plots that begin in one book and continue into another. For me, this is one of the most interesting possibilities offered by series form. We've gotten used to the idea that characters are going to reappear in book after book, and grow and change in the process. It may be a little harder to get used to the idea that a sub-plot may begin in one book and be developed as a central plot in the next.
That's the way I handled McQuaid's paralysis, which begins with LOVE LIES BLEEDING (#6), is a major plot issue in CHILE DEATH (#7), and is more or less resolved by the time China and McQuaid are married in LAVENDER LIES (#8). I'm doing something of the sort with Ruby's current flame Colin Fowler, who is introduced in BONES. His plot begins in that book, continues into BLEEDING HEARTS (out in April), and is resolved in SPANISH DAGGER (currently under construction.) For me, these book sequences function as trilogies within the overall series.
I understand that some readers are frustrated by these continuing plots--although I hope they will be less frustrated when the trilogy is complete and they can read the entire sequence without interruption. In fact, I know this happens, because I get letters from people who have just discovered the existence of the "hidden trilogy," find it interesting, and wonder if I intended it that way.
And if you're one of the readers who are frustrated by the developing Colin Fowler plot, maybe you'll consider what Barbara Paul (another mystery writer) has said about this issue. She doesn't address the potential of the book-bridging plot, but she does have something important to say about the artificiality of the "neatly-tied-up" plot, which follows the conventional problem-solving pattern of the mystery but in many ways trivializes the subject matter that most mystery writers work with:
I've long made the claim that people who read mysteries hate mysteries. What we like are solutions. The mystery novel is the only kind of book a reader can pick up knowing ahead of time that questions will be answered, that problems will be solved. Every mystery writer makes a promise to the reader that order will be restored by the final page. It's that guarantee, from writer to reader, that I think accounts for the mystery's continuing popularity.
And yet, that traditional ending of tying everything up neatly has been showing signs of change. Occasionally a mystery writer will deliberately leave some minor thread untied (because some questions simply don't have answers) and thus runs the risk of seeing a reviewer denounce the book for leaving a problem unsolved. Or once in a while we see a book in which all the loose ends are tied up, but not in quite the way we might want them to be. Order is restored, as promised, but sometimes this restoration comes at a price that is perhaps too high.
These changes are good in that they add a more realistic touch to the conclusions. They do away with the old-fashioned parlor-game aspect of earlier mysteries, an aspect that keeps the horror of violent death at a safe distance and is appropriate for comic mysteries (but for little else). Instead, we're seeing more and more mystery novels that ask the reader to recognize the sheer ugliness of the act of murder -- a development that can only benefit the genre. And all these changes demonstrate one significant fact, that the rules governing mystery writing aren't nearly so rigid as they might appear.
I like working with genre fiction precisely because it has a strong form that sets up certain expectations in the mind of the reader. But I also like to challenge that form. I like to surprise readers by breaking a rule, by turning a convention upside-down, by thwarting expectations. I'm not always successful. Heck, I don't know--maybe I'm almost never successful. But that's what lies behind many of the things I do in the China novels. And that's one of the things I'm doing with these book-bridging plots.
Reading Notes: To be surprised, to wonder, is to begin to understand.--Jose Ortega y Gasset.